Skip to content
unlob

Web search API alternatives

One page per provider, with its price, index position, funding and the alternatives worth considering. Figures come from each vendor's own pages, dated.

Verified 5 August 2026·All figures from primary sources

Before you compare

Which kind of search API do you need?

Comparing across categories on price is how teams end up rebuilding six months later. Settle the category first; four of these five answers are not us.

Pick the branch that describes you.

  • Ifyou need Google's own ranking, exactly as a person would see it

    Nothing else returns Google’s results. They also inherit the deprecation and pricing risk of the engine behind them.

  • Ifyou already build on Gemini or Azure and want nothing extra to integrate

    Nothing to wire up if you are already there; no control over the index or the price if you are not.

  • Ifyou already have the URLs and need clean page text

    Essential in most stacks, and they need something to hand them the URLs.

  • Ifyou want the provider to research the question and write the answer

    You buy the provider’s judgement, on its models, priced per task.

  • Ifyour own model should reason over evidence that carries provenance, independence and a receipt

    The evidence layer beneath whichever model you run, from an index we own.

Most branches lead elsewhere, on purpose. A decision tree whose every leaf is the seller's product is an advertisement.

Own-index search APIs

These vendors crawl and index the web themselves. Nobody upstream can deprecate them, reprice them or rate-limit them.

Platform grounding

Search bundled into a model platform. Nothing to integrate if you are already there, and no control over retrieval if you are not.

Retrieval layers

These sit on top of other search providers and add cleaning, ranking and citation. Convenient, with someone else’s index underneath.

SERP resellers

These return results from Google or Bing. Cheap and familiar, but the product exists at the pleasure of a search engine that does not want it to.

Crawl & extraction

These turn a URL into clean text. Essential in most stacks, but they need something to hand them the URLs.

How to read an alternatives page

Each page profiles one provider and then lists what you would realistically move to, ranked by category first and price second. We appear on all of them, and we say so rather than presenting ourselves as a neutral finding. Every figure on every page carries a dated link to the vendor's own source; where a vendor publishes no comparable per-1,000 rate, the field is empty and a note explains why rather than carrying an estimate.

The category matters more than the price. A SERP reseller, a retrieval layer, an extraction tool and an own-index API fail in genuinely different ways, and swapping across categories on headline rate is how teams end up rebuilding six months later. Thelandscape page sets out the five categories with the same sources behind them.

Why anyone is looking

Three things moved this market in eighteen months: the Bing Web Search API was retired outright in August 2025, Brave replaced its perpetual free developer tier with a monthly credit in February 2026, and Tavily was acquired the same month. None of those changed an HTTP signature much, and all three sent teams shopping. Themigration guides handle the three most common moves parameter by parameter.

Before committing to whatever comes next, it is worthmeasuring coverage against your own URLs rather than against a claim about index size. Coverage is a relation between an index and your workload, and only you hold the second half of it.

The cheapest own-index option is $0.40 per 1,000

Start free, run your own queries, and decide from results rather than from a comparison table — including ours.

API and MCP reference ↗