What you give up when your search API resells someone else's results
And the more uncomfortable half of the argument: owning an index used to be the whole pitch, and in 2026 it is table stakes.
The three risks of a borrowed index
Deprecation
Microsoft disabled new Bing Search API keys in March 2025 and retired the service on 11 August, taking Web, Image, News, Video, Entity, Autosuggest, Spell Check and Custom Search with it. Every product built on it had to be rewritten, however good the results had been.
Repricing
Brave retired its long-standing free developer tier in February 2026, replacing it with a $5 monthly credit. That is a legitimate business decision — and if your onboarding funnel depended on it, it was also your problem overnight.
Rate limits
A reseller's throughput is whatever its upstream allows, shared across every one of its customers. When you scale, you are negotiating for a slice of a quota that belongs to someone else entirely.
Bright DataProxy, unblocking and scraping infrastructure
The uncomfortable half: ownership is no longer the differentiator
In 2024, "we run our own index" was a complete argument. It is not one now. Exa raised $250 million in May 2026 at a $2.2 billion valuation; Parallel Web Systems reached $2.0 billion in April. Both crawl and index the web themselves. Brave has been doing it across 40 billion pages for years.
So owning an index is now the entry requirement rather than the edge. If a vendor's pitch stops there, it is a 2024 pitch. Four things still separate providers:
The third half: ownership you can deploy is still the differentiator
There is one buyer for whom the 2024 argument never stopped being true. A government, a regulator, a public broadcaster or a defence programme building agents on a sovereign model has spent heavily to keep the model at home — and then grounds it through a search API that sends every query abroad. The model is sovereign. The question it asks is not.
Exa, Parallel and Brave own their indexes, and each serves from one jurisdiction on its own terms; none of them can be stood up inside a customer's boundary. Because unlob builds and serves its own index, the whole evidence layer can be. That is what we mean by deployable ownership: the index, the coverage graph, the receipts and the record of what was asked all stay inside your jurisdiction, beneath whichever model you run. It is the one respect in which owning an index is still the edge rather than the entry requirement, and it is the whole of the sovereign edition.
$14 per 1,000 search queries on Gemini 3.x after 5,000 free prompts per month. Gemini 2.5 models use the older scheme at $35 per 1,000. One prompt can trigger several billed queries.
A per-request search fee of roughly $5 to $14 per 1,000 on top of token charges ($1/$1 per million on Sonar, $3/$15 on Sonar Pro). Pro Search mode runs $14 to $22 per 1,000.
Base search is $7 per 1,000 requests. Results beyond the first 10 add $1 per 1,000, contents add $1 per 1,000 pages, and AI summaries another $1 per 1,000 — so a realistic RAG call costs more than the headline.
The Turbo search processor is $1 per 1,000; Basic and Advanced are both $5 per 1,000. The Task API, which is what most agent workloads actually use, runs $5 to $2,400 per 1,000 depending on processor.
Yes
Proprietary web index and retrieval infrastructure
$199 per month for 500,000 credits, and a search is one credit.
Yes
Our own crawl and index
$0.40
This page
Own-index providers only, plus the platform grounding APIs most teams default to. SERP resellers are excluded here because they are a different product — see the landscape page for the full field.
Frequently asked questions
Which search APIs own their index?
Exa, Parallel, Brave, Mojeek, Diffbot and unlob crawl and index the web themselves. Google Custom Search, Gemini grounding and Perplexity serve a first-party index on their own terms. SerpAPI, Serper and DataForSEO resell Google or Bing results, and Tavily and Linkup add a retrieval layer on top of other providers.
Why does index ownership matter if the results are the same?
Because the results are only the same until they are not. When Microsoft retired the Bing Web Search API in August 2025, every product built on it had to be rewritten regardless of how good the results had been. A reseller cannot promise you continuity it does not have.
Is a SERP reseller ever the right choice?
Yes — when you specifically need Google's ranking. SEO tooling, rank tracking and any workload where the product is literally "what does Google show" should use a SERP API. The mistake is using one for agent retrieval, where you want good sources rather than Google's ordering of them.
Is owning an index still a differentiator?
Not on its own, not any more. In 2024 it was the whole argument. By 2026, Exa and Parallel each run their own index with roughly $2 billion valuations behind them. What still differentiates is what you pay per query, whether the API can traverse relationships rather than just rank documents, and whether it will tell you what it excluded.
How big is the unlob index?
Smaller than Google, smaller than the well-funded competitors, and bounded deliberately rather than accidentally — we admit a curated core and fill the tail on demand. The honest framing is that we optimise for precision of inclusion rather than raw size, and that why_not will tell you exactly what is not there.
Can the index run inside our jurisdiction?
Yes. Because we build and serve our own index, the whole evidence layer — index, coverage graph and receipts — can be deployed inside a customer boundary: a national cloud, your VPC, or a disconnected environment. At query time nothing leaves. That is the one respect in which owning an index is still a differentiator: Exa, Parallel and Brave own theirs, in one jurisdiction, on their terms. The sovereign edition page sets out the four deployment shapes.
An index we control, at a price nobody else offers
Start free and see whether the coverage holds up for your workload. If it does not, why_not will tell you exactly where.