Skip to content
unlob

unlob vs Perplexity Sonar

Sonar returns a synthesised answer with citations. unlob returns results you control, at a fraction of the per-request search fee.

Verified 5 August 2026·Figures from vendors' own pages

On the headline rate that is 35× — $14 per 1,000 against $0.40. Both figures are computed from the published plan tables rather than typed into this page, so they follow the vendors rather than drifting from them.

Price

  • unlob$0.40
  • Perplexity Sonar$14
Per 1,000 comparable web searches — about ten results, no extraction, no summarisation. Log scale, because the spread is over an order of magnitude.
ProviderOwn index?$ / 1,000 queriesSource

A per-request search fee of roughly $5 to $14 per 1,000 on top of token charges ($1/$1 per million on Sonar, $3/$15 on Sonar Pro). Pro Search mode runs $14 to $22 per 1,000.

Yes

Perplexity index

$14Perplexity API pricing

$29 per month for 50,000 requests.

Yes

Our own crawl and index

$0.58This page

$199 per month for 500,000 requests.

Yes

Our own crawl and index

$0.40This page
Rates are the cheapest directly comparable web search call — roughly ten results, no extraction and no summarisation — because that is the only way a table across credit systems, token pricing and per-request pricing means anything. Where a vendor does not publish a flat per-1,000 rate they are omitted from this table and covered in full on the landscape page. Figures read from each vendor’s own pricing page on 5 August 2026.

When Perplexity Sonar is the better choice

A comparison page that cannot name a scenario where the competitor wins is an advertisement. Here are the real ones.

Choose Perplexity Sonar

  • You want an answer, not results, and do not need to control how it was assembled.
  • Minimum integration effort — one call replaces retrieval, ranking and synthesis.
  • Perplexity’s index and freshness on news-shaped queries are strong.

Choose unlob

  • You need the retrieved passages themselves, to reason over, cite selectively or feed a specific model.
  • Cost: a request here is a request, with no token charges layered on top.
  • Filtering, sorting and deduplication under your control rather than the vendor’s.
  • Graph traversal and coverage auditing.

The substantive differences

Perplexity Sonarunlob
What you get backA written answer with citations.Ranked passages with metadata and trust signals. assemble_context comes closest, and still returns passages rather than prose.
PricingPer-request search fees of $5–14 per 1,000 plus token charges ($1/$1 per million on Sonar, $3/$15 on Sonar Pro).$0.40 per 1,000, no token component.
Model choicePerplexity’s models.Whichever model you like, or none.

Sources

Every figure on this page was read from the vendor's own pricing page or funding announcement on the date shown.

Frequently asked questions

Is Sonar cheaper than running search plus your own model?

Sometimes, for simple questions where you would have used a similar model anyway. It stops being cheaper as soon as you make several retrieval calls per turn, because each carries its own search fee — and it removes the option of using a cheaper model for synthesis.

Check the claims yourself

The free tier is 10,000 requests a month with no card. That is enough to test coverage, latency and result quality against your own queries — which is a better comparison than this page.