Skip to content
unlob

unlob vs Valyu

Valyu spans web plus licensed proprietary corpora with publisher attribution. unlob is open-web only, at a published flat rate.

Verified 5 August 2026·Figures from vendors' own pages

Price

ProviderOwn index?$ / 1,000 queriesSource

$29 per month for 50,000 requests.

Yes

Our own crawl and index

$0.58This page

$199 per month for 500,000 requests.

Yes

Our own crawl and index

$0.40This page
Rates are the cheapest directly comparable web search call — roughly ten results, no extraction and no summarisation — because that is the only way a table across credit systems, token pricing and per-request pricing means anything. Where a vendor does not publish a flat per-1,000 rate they are omitted from this table and covered in full on the landscape page. Figures read from each vendor’s own pricing page on 5 August 2026.

When Valyu is the better choice

A comparison page that cannot name a scenario where the competitor wins is an advertisement. Here are the real ones.

Choose Valyu

  • Licensed and paywalled sources that no open-web crawler can legitimately reach.
  • Publisher attribution and monetisation, if that matters to your position on content rights.
  • Multi-modal retrieval across mixed source types.

Choose unlob

  • Open-web retrieval at a published flat rate.
  • Graph traversal and corroboration signals.
  • Coverage transparency.

The substantive differences

Valyuunlob
CorpusOpen web plus licensed proprietary sources.Open web only.
PricingUsage-based, quoted per source and depth.A flat published rate per tier.

Sources

Every figure on this page was read from the vendor's own pricing page or funding announcement on the date shown.

Frequently asked questions

Can unlob search paywalled content?

No. We crawl the open web, respect robots.txt, and do not circumvent paywalls. If licensed content is essential to your use case, a provider with licensing agreements is the right choice.

Check the claims yourself

The free tier is 10,000 requests a month with no card. That is enough to test coverage, latency and result quality against your own queries — which is a better comparison than this page.